lunes, 13 de junio de 2016

Pre-Assessment for Differentiation

In this blog, I am sharing a differentiation and assessments for a unit about addition and subtraction for kindergarten. The target of the unit is “Students will be able to solve addition and subtraction problems using different strategies.” The common core standards (www.corestandards.org/Math/Content/K/OA/) for this unit are:

CCSS.MATH.CONTENT.K.OA.A.1 Represent addition and subtraction with objects, fingers, mental images, drawings1, sounds (e.g., claps), acting out situations, verbal explanations, expressions, or equations.

CCSS.MATH.CONTENT.K.OA.A.2 Solve addition and subtraction word problems, and add and subtract within 10, e.g., by using objects or drawings to represent the problem.

Kindergarten is a grade level where the students come from different educational backgrounds, some students come from Pre K programs and for others is the first time in a school. This background and other student’s experiences bring to the kindergarten classes a variety of academic levels. For this reason is important that teachers collect information about the students to differentiate the instruction. For this specific unit, the tool used to collect the initial screen about the knowledge of students in addition and subtraction is a pre-assessment.

The pre-assessment for this unit was created in Quizlet. The assessment contain 9 questions including different types of question (Written, matching, multiple choice, and true/false). The assessment is available in the following link:

Before started the instruction, all students took the pre-assessment. The information collected was:

  • 5 students answered most, including the most difficult, of the pre-assessment questions correctly.
  • 12 students have some knowledge about the topic as shown in their score, but need to develop higher order thinking skills.
  • 5 students appear to have limited knowledge about the topic.

For each group, I have planned the following strategies and assessment to measure the process. The details of the strategies are in the following mind map: 

https://atlas.mindmup.com/jasolca/innovative_differentiation_strategies/index.html


sábado, 4 de junio de 2016

The data tells one story

I would like to start this blog with a question that help me to introduce the topic, the question is “What is the role of high stakes assessments in the schools?” There are many answers to this question but I would like to focus in the role that the assessments play in the evaluation of the education system. As a system, the education needs to be evaluated. As mentioned the American Psychological Association, and National Council on Measurement in Education (1999) “Measuring what and how well students learn is an important building block in the process of strengthening and improving our nation's schools… Some public officials and educational administrators are increasingly calling for the use of tests to make high-stakes decisions, such as whether a student will move on to the next grade level or receive a diploma.” This role of evaluation of the system and data to improve the education in a country is helping to create adequate public policies in education. In my experience when I was working in the area of education in an international organization, I can noticed the interes of the countries to participate in standardized assessments like The Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) to evaluate their Public Education System and compare their systems with other countries. The problem is the information collected with the assessment, the data tells one story, and these test can only provide a "snapshot" of student achievement and may not accurately reflect an entire year's worth of student progress and achievement.

The data tells one history, but our students have many important strengths and areas of need that are not collected in the assessments. As teachers we know that children develop at different paces and in different areas, our students have varied previous schooling activity, language background and personal needs, but the assessment are the same for all. These data from the assessments could show some needs of the students and teachers needs to translate this information in effective information that help them to create their educational plans for their students.

Continue in the teacher’s level, the assessments a variety of roles but I would like to refer specifically to the role of collecting academic data and evaluate the teacher performance. Students’ assessments collect students’ data depending on the grade level and area of knowledge. For example, in my case as a Spanish kindergarten teacher in a bilingual school, I only have to test my students two times a year to know the reading level in Spanish calls EDL (Spanish Reading Assessment for dual language, bilingual, and immersion classrooms that helps Spanish-speaking students become independent successful readers with tools to assess reading engagement, fluency, and comprehension. EDL2 is the Spanish equivalent of DRA2 http://www.pearsonschool.com/index.cfm?locator=PSZwK4) but in math we do not have a specific assessment. When the students goes to other grades the number or assessment increase, for instance in third grade they need to take the PARCC exam and a multitude of different assessment for each area of knowledge. Also, the students’ assessments are part of the evaluation of the teachers’ performance in some countries or states. In the District of Columbia the results of the students’ assessments are part of the evaluation of the teacher performance as a component of the IMPACT (http://dcps.dc.gov/page/impact-overview) that is system for assessing and rewarding the performance of teachers. The results of the students’ assessments are the 10% of the evaluation and could help the teacher to be rewarded.

In a teacher daily life the assessments require a lot of time. For example, in a class of 30 students (like my current kindergarten class) the teachers can spend around 20 minutes per student making a reading assessment or 1 hour in the higher levels, so the total time to complete all the assessments is 600 to 1800 minutes, and more time to evaluate them.

The other perspective of the assessments is the influence of the score in the students. Some schools or teachers can use incorrectly the data collected and define the students in a number or letters establish by their score. For this reason, some parents are organized to request an education without assessments, one clear example is the United Opt Out National (http://unitedoptout.com/) which has the goal to help educate parents on how to protest high-stakes testing tied to school accountability and student progress.

Finally, I thing that the education and educator need to rethink the evaluation process of their students. Our goal as a teacher is help the students to learn and the current assessments is not helping us in our goal.

Resources:
American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, and National Council on Measurement in Education (1999). Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.

The National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) https://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=1

Opt Out National http://unitedoptout.com/